Re: Dotimes (re: wish list)

["Daniel Ajoy" <dajoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 24 Nov 2002 at 16:31, Mike Sandy wrote:

>  There will always be some programs for which the range: 0 to n-1,
>  is preferable to: 1 to n, I've written both and so I'm sure have you,
>  but that was not the point I was making.

For some reason, I have come across many more in which 0 is preferable.

>  I notice that REPCOUNT was included in your group "wish list",
>  but no mention of removing DOTIMES.
> 
>  If both REPCOUNT and DOTIMES are present then I am arguing
>  on the basis of consistency, for the same range.

I understand. I like consistency, too. And I guess at this point
consistency is more important than the minor inconveniences that
cause "repeat" starting at 1. I was just curious about your reasons.
 
>  For practised programmers it may be little effort to
>  remember the different ranges but for young learners
>  it is yet another item, to add to the exceptions. So make the ranges
>  the same.

I agree.

>  The reason I chose an initial value of 1, was
>  I use MSWlogo as well as MW, as I'm sure do others, in which
>  case a change for the range of REPCOUNT would be a disadvantage. What
>  about yourself?

I use LogoFE's "iota" :)

show iota 10
[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9]

and do things like:

cs foreach iota 10 [setturtle ? rt random 360 fd 100] 


Daniel
OpenWorld Learning

_______________________________________________
MWForum mailing list
MWForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mia.openworldlearning.org/mwforum/